Cahiers Figura

Gothic Art in Four Romantic Authors

Année de parution:

Benjamin Disraeli remarked in 1833 that a key dereliction of modern belief–systems (such as Utilitarianism in political philosophy and Unitarianism in religion) was to omit the imagination. Why did he and other XIXth century authors turn for remedy in this particular regard to Gothic art? Four examples –drawn from Wordsworth (1798), Keats (1819), Stendhal (1830) and Disraeli (1845)– suggest that Gothic art was invoked by a few prominent Romantic authors, not to thrill us with haunted castles, but for a more complex purpose. Their goal was to bring a repressed religious imagination out in the open while also guarding against solipsism. All four authors saw in Gothic architecture a model of transcendent unity based on harmonizing, rather than suppressing, heterogeneous elements. At once naturalistic and mystical, Gothic cosmophilia (love of beauty) offered a welcome alternative both to an increasingly bleak secularism and to a narrow Evangelical moralism. Gothic cathedrals spoke of the soul’s vertical dimension against democratic leveling, while Gothic abbeys spoke of human equality before God. Gothic imagery thus allowed our authors to rekindle a distinctly religious imagination without forsaking key commitments of the modern project.

Suite en format pdf.

Numéro de la publication:
Langue du contenu:
Pour citer ce document:
Davenport, Anne A. 2008. « Gothic Art in Four Romantic Authors ». Dans Paroles, textes et images : Formes et pouvoirs de l'imaginaire. Article d’un cahier Figura. En ligne sur le site de l’Observatoire de l’imaginaire contemporain. <>. Consulté le 22 août 2019. D’abord paru dans (Chassay, Jean-François et Bertrand Gervais (dir.). 2008. Montréal : Figura, Centre de recherche sur le texte et l'imaginaire. coll. Figura, vol. 19:1).
Fichier attachéTaille
cf191-5-davenport-gothic_art.pdf897.06 Ko
Aires de recherche:
Période historique:
Champs disciplinaires:
Objets et pratiques culturelles: